When discussing photography, particularly the epic battle between portrait and landscape, I realise I’m like a kid in a candy store with no idea what to pick. Sure, I’ve started developing a soft spot for portraiture—maybe because humans are so entertaining! We’re like a reality show in the wild: complex, dramatic, and sometimes, you just have to laugh at the sheer chaos of it all.

Portrait photography is like a soap opera, full of depth and tension. Especially when you go black and white—suddenly, everyone looks like they’re auditioning for a serious role. Those subtle facial variations are gold: every wrinkle tells a little story, and every smile says, “I did something hilarious last night!” If you look closely, a furrowed brow might just be a sign that someone forgot their lunch. This truly highlights the ongoing decision to choose portrait or landscape.

On the flip side, landscape photography is like that zen friend who swears by meditation. It’s peaceful, sure, but sometimes it feels like nature’s just showing off, saying, “Look how vast and empty I am!” Sure, it can evoke tranquillity or make you wonder about life’s meaning, but it won’t tell you whether someone’s about to break into an outrageous dance or spill coffee on their shirt. When considering portraits or landscapes, landscapes certainly offer a serene escape.

Ultimately, both genres have charm, but I lean toward portrait photography. Why? Because capturing the wild ride of human existence is just more fun! Each image is like a peek into a theatre, where every snap tells a story that leaves you chuckling long after the shutter clicks!